Laboratory testing services, medical (except radiological, X-ray) · Minnesota

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS

Roseville, MN · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laboratory testing services, medical (except radiological, X-ray) workplace, earning a grade F.

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS: 8.4 TCR = 220% of Laboratory testing services, medical (except radiological, X-ray) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS safety composite

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS: 0.0 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2024

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS's TCR rose 8.6 from 0.0 in 2020 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621511 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 220% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO MultiCare labs
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MultiCare labs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS averages 8.4 TCR (220% of the Laboratory testing services, medical (except radiological, X-ray) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS falls in its industry

162 Laboratory testing services, m establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Laboratory testing services, m employers in Minnesota.

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS (44 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS
Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS (44 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS has fewer employees than the Laboratory testing services, medical (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.6 3 0 0
2023 11.3 11.3 4 0 0
2022 12.3 12.3 4 0 0
2021 9.7 3.2 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621511 · MN · Roseville

162 Laboratory testing services, medical (except radiological, X-ray) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MultiCare labs 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Diagnostic Laboratories 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony Diagnostic Brockton 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yellowstone Pathology Institute 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE West River 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Ctr-LL 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Facility 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WasteWater Treatment Facility 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Youngstown Shop OH FXFE-YNGS 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Parks and Recreation (300) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Juvenile Probation (270) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1335 - Surprise 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE EPC- Stafford 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binghamton NY FXFE-BGM 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta West 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schultheis Roofing Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.