Industry profile · NAICS 621511

Testing laboratories, medical

Workplace injury rates across 180 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

180
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
2,245
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Testing laboratories, medical average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

5.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.8
BLS national benchmark
180
employers reporting
2,245
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Testing laboratories, medical Safety Data Reveals

The Testing laboratories, medical sector (NAICS 621511) encompasses 180 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,245 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Testing laboratories, medical that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
US Labs Middletown Middletown, CT F 28.3
Diagnostic Laboratories and Radiology Manteca Manteca, CA F 27.0
Caldwell ID Caldwell, ID F 26.8
Diagnostic Laboratories and Radiology Fresno Fresno, CA F 23.9
American Diagnostic Horsham Horsham, PA F 21.3
Symphony Diagnostic Peoria Peoria, IL F 20.3
American Diagnostic Piscataway Piscataway, NJ F 17.9
Symphony Diagnostic Southfield Southfield, MI F 17.3
Symphony Diagnostic Norfolk Norfolk, VA F 17.2
Aculabs Inc East Brunswick, NJ F 16.6
Symphony Diagnostic Louisville Louisville, KY F 15.8
Santa Fe Medical Center Santa Fe, NM F 15.1
SJRMC Laboratory Mishawaka, IN F 14.2
Diagnostic Laboratories and Radiology Burbank Burbank, CA F 12.5
Centura Outreach Lab Centennial, CO F 11.9
110 Central Avenue Farmingdale, NY F 11.8
CellRight Technologies, LLC Universal City, TX F 11.7
Symphony Diagnostic Piscataway Piscataway, NJ F 11.6
Lmc-Trl-Lovelace Medical Center Albuquerque, NM F 11.5
Pacific Diagnostics Laboratories Santa Barbara, CA F 11.2
Riverside Medical Group Consolidated Laboratory Newport News, VA F 10.7
Poplar Healthcare Memphis, TN F 10.3
PathGroup 658 Grassmere Nashville, TN F 9.6
Diagnostic Laboratories and Radiology Denver Denver, CO F 9.5
US Labs Brockton Brockton, MA F 9.3
North American Science Associates - BP Brooklyn Park, MN F 9.2
346 Seguine Avenue Staten Island, NY F 9.2
Collaborative Laboratory Services Hartford, CT F 9.0
Diagnostic Laboratories and Radiology Phoenix Phoenix, AZ F 8.8
Yellowstone Pathology Institute Billings, MT F 8.6
Symphony Diagnostic Brockton Brockton, MA F 8.6
MultiCare labs Tacoma, WA F 8.4
Cardinal Health Roseville NPHS Roseville, MN F 8.4
Pacific Diagnostic Laboratories Santa Barbara, CA F 8.2
Collaborative Labratory Services Hartford, CT F 8.0
Symphony Diagnostic Birmingham Birmingham, AL F 8.0
Kph-Trl-Kaseman Hospital Albuquerque, NM F 7.7
American Diagnostic Clearwater Clearwater, FL D 7.5
Symphony Diagnostic Fairmont Fairmont, WV D 7.5
Kachina Medical Plaza Yuma, AZ D 7.3
West Allis NPHS West Allis, WI D 7.3
Capital Choice Pathology Laboratory Silver Spring, MD D 7.0
Distribution Center San Diego, CA D 6.9
Greenwood, IN-Biolife 668 Greenwood, IN D 6.9
Kachina Medical Center Yuma, AZ D 6.6
WESTPAC LABS Central San Luis Obispo, CA D 6.5
South Bend Medical Foundation South Bend, IN D 6.3
Central Lab South Bend, IN D 6.3
Mercy Laboratories Springfield, MA D 6.3
California Office San Diego, CA D 6.2
Page 1 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Testing laboratories, medical?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.