Automobile Remanufacture · Pennsylvania
Cardone Plant 90+95
PHILADELPHIA, PA · ~376 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 2.6
- Avg TCR
- 5.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Cardone Plant 90+95 runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate — far safer than the typical Automobile Remanufacture workplace — earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 2.6
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 5.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 40
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Cardone Plant 90+95's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 5 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Cardone Plant 90+95's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493110.
Cardone Plant 90+95 has an average TCR of 2.6, which is 44% of the industry average (5.8) for Automobile Remanufacture. This is significantly better than average.
Safety Insights for Cardone Plant 90+95
Cardone Plant 90+95 operates an establishment with approximately 376 full-time equivalent workers in PHILADELPHIA, PA, classified under the Automobile Remanufacture industry (NAICS 493110). Across 5 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 40 recordable injuries, 5 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the A letter grade (Excellent Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 5.8 for Automobile Remanufacture, Cardone Plant 90+95's workforce experiences 44% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 5 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Cardone Plant 90+95 as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Cardone Plant 90+95's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493110 — Automobile Remanufacture.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2022)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 434,458 hours worked = 0.46 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cardone Plant 90+95 (this establishment) | 2.56 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 5-year avg |
| Warehousing and storage, general merchandise industry avg | 5.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 493110 |
| Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) | 5.06 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Cardone Plant 90+95 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2022: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 16 reportable incidents · 11 injuries, 5 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 10 reportable incidents · 10 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 16 reportable incidents · 16 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 11 | 5 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cardone Plant 90+95's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Cardone Plant 90+95 reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.