Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing · Massachusetts

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc

Danvers, MA · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc safety composite

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc held a steady TCR band

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Danvers, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/8
  • PHOTO Smiths Detection Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smiths Detection Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carl Zeiss Smt Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Carl Zeiss Smt Inc falls in its industry

60 Irradiation apparatus and tube establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 Irradiation apparatus and tube employers in Massachusetts.

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc (43 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Carl Zeiss Smt Inc
Carl Zeiss Smt Inc (43 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Carl Zeiss Smt Inc has fewer employees than the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., i median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · MA · Danvers

60 Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 119 employers in Danvers, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smiths Detection Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varian, Charlottesville 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accuray Incorporated - Madison WI 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joe Czajkowski Farm/Lakeside Organics of Hadley 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guaranteed Builders and Developers Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Comfort, Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acella 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abiomed, Inc. (Danvers HQ) 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Arc 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic-CVG 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millipore Sigma 17 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers 943 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 432 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 426 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 240 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE nexAir Union City Plant 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE TRIPAC-CORONA 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tutor Perini - Division 20 Portal Widening Project 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holly Construction Company 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.