Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carmel Village

Fountain Valley, CA · ~98 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carmel Village runs at 406% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carmel Village: 15.4 TCR = 406% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carmel Village safety composite

Carmel Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2024

Carmel Village injury rate improved

Carmel Village's TCR fell 1.6 from 13.4 in 2018 to 11.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.4 · 2019=19.2 · 2020=29.8 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=11.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fountain Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 406% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #510/635
  • PHOTO Villages of Windsor
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villages of Windsor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carmel Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carmel Village averages 15.4 TCR (406% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carmel Village TCR series: 2018=13.4 · 2019=19.2 · 2020=29.8 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=11.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Carmel Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #510 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carmel Village (98 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carmel Village
Carmel Village (98 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carmel Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.8 6.7 7 0 0
2023 4.8 3.6 4 0 0
2022 12.6 2.5 8 2 0
2021 16.3 15.0 3 9 0
2020 29.8 29.8 9 17 0
2019 19.2 11.8 13 5 0
2018 13.4 13.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fountain Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fountain Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villages of Windsor 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY TRUMBULL OPERATION LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Reserve at Mills Farm 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chelsea at Brookfield 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal GVIC Ranches 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapala Berry Farms 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag-Wise Enterprises, Inc 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bains Orchards Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR OCM00 ORANGE COAST MEMORIAL MED CTR 1,826 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-024 1,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMF00 MEMORIALCARE MED FOUNDATION 1,470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pan-Pacific Mechanical 924 FTE
NAT-TCR 190 Overland Park 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuttle Dairy 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Western State Hospital 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakley - Belvidere 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Environmental, Inc 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magnolia Electric Power 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greystone Construction 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Superior Walls 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.