Garbage collection services · New Hampshire

Casella Waste Systems - Salem

Salem, NH · ~77 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Casella Waste Systems - Salem runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Casella Waste Systems - Salem: 8.5 TCR = 328% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Casella Waste Systems - Salem safety composite

Casella Waste Systems - Salem scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2020→2024

Casella Waste Systems - Salem injury rate improved

Casella Waste Systems - Salem's TCR fell 4.7 from 10.3 in 2020 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Salem, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 328% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO GFL Environmental St…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GFL Environmental Sterling Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Casella Waste Systems - Salem in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Casella Waste Systems - Salem averages 8.5 TCR (328% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Casella Waste Systems - Salem TCR series: 2020=10.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=11.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Casella Waste Systems - Salem falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Garbage collection services employers in New Hampshire.

Casella Waste Systems - Salem (77 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Casella Waste Systems - Salem
Casella Waste Systems - Salem (77 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Casella Waste Systems - Salem has more employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.8 5 1 0
2023 4.8 4.8 5 0 0
2022 11.8 10.7 11 0 0
2021 10.2 7.7 8 0 0
2020 10.3 10.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NH · Salem

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 100 employers in Salem, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GFL Environmental Sterling Heights 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03170 - WM of Southern MN - Mason City 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S08881 - WM of Marysville 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Detroit Department of Public Works - Solid Waste Division 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE The MacMillin Company, LLC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Busby Construction 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE HHP, INC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE LENTEX CORPORATION 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Rehabilitation Hospital Network 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT CANOBIE LAKE PARK-FAST FOOD 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #6 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #06 434 FTE
NAT-TCR Winston Homebuilders 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Illinois Foundation Seed Inc- Harvard 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Emmet Williams Elementary School 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Plains Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Traton LLC 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Broward- BARC 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Invictus Logistics 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ecological Fibers, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.