Elementary and Secondary Schools · Minnesota

Emmet Williams Elementary School

Shoreview, MN · ~91 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emmet Williams Elementary School runs at 609% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and Secondary Schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Emmet Williams Elementary School: 8.5 TCR = 609% of Elementary and Secondary Schools BLS 1.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emmet Williams Elementary School safety composite

Emmet Williams Elementary School scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Emmet Williams Elementary School: 1.8 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Emmet Williams Elementary School's TCR rose 7.5 from 1.8 in 2020 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Shoreview, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 609% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #1399/1589
  • PHOTO Richmond Elementary
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richmond Elementary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Emmet Williams Elementary School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emmet Williams Elementary School averages 8.5 TCR (609% of the Elementary and Secondary Schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emmet Williams Elementary School TCR series: 2020=1.8 · 2021=5 · 2022=15.7 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 1.4

Where Emmet Williams Elementary School falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and Secondary Schoo establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1399 safest of 1589 Elementary and Secondary Schoo employers in Minnesota.

Emmet Williams Elementary School (91 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Emmet Williams Elementary School
Emmet Williams Elementary School (91 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Emmet Williams Elementary School has more employees than the Elementary and Secondary Schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 5.6 5 0 0
2023 10.8 9.0 6 0 0
2022 15.7 11.0 10 0 0
2021 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Shoreview

3,374 Elementary and Secondary Schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 41 employers in Shoreview, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richmond Elementary 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southview Elementary 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sage Park Middle School 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRANSPORTATION CENTER - WCS 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Boy Farms, LLP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Improvement, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJ Mechanical Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harty Mechanical 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes, Inc. Shoreview 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR TSI Incorporated 544 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0619 - Shoreview 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Shoreview 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Casella Waste Systems - Salem 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Winston Homebuilders 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Illinois Foundation Seed Inc- Harvard 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Plains Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Thermal Systems 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fredon Corp 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Industrial Transport 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne County Hospital 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.