Telecommunications · Maryland

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD

Annapolis Junction, MD · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications workplace, earning a grade D.

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD: 4.3 TCR = 153% of Telecommunications BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD safety composite

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2019→2020

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD injury rate improved

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD's TCR fell 3.5 from 6.1 in 2019 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.1 · 2020=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Annapolis Junction, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 153% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #59/77
  • PHOTO Liberty Integrated S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Integrated Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD averages 4.3 TCR (153% of the Telecommunications BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD TCR series: 2019=6.1 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 77 Telecommunications employers in Maryland.

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD (36 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD
CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD (36 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CCG:CG035 - CG035 -Annapolis Junction, MD has fewer employees than the Telecommunications median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 6.1 6.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MD · Annapolis Junction

4,550 Telecommunications employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 29 employers in Annapolis Junction, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Integrated Solutions 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circuit Electric Michigan 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worcester, MA Office/Warehouse 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ewing Signal Construction, LLC 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ForwardGro, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibraltar Construction Co., Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maryland 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifestar Response of Maryland, Inc. - Annapolis Junction Base 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Annapolis Junction 410 N (5002) 286 FTE
NAT-TCR 94000 GWIT - Goodwill Contract Services 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1159 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1281 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LEX1 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ANS:ANLAW - ANLAW-Lawrenceville, GA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSC:NSK19 - NSK19 - North Sky Olympia, WA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Morrison 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalispell KS 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.