Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) · Ohio
CCL Design-Brunswick
BRUNSWICK, OH · ~92 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
CCL Design-Brunswick runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares CCL Design-Brunswick's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
CCL Design-Brunswick's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 322220.
Where CCL Design-Brunswick falls in its industry
381 Coating purchased papers for n establishmentsSafer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.
CCL Design-Brunswick has an average TCR of 2.2, which is 66% of the industry average (3.3) for Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper). This is better than average.
Safety Insights for CCL Design-Brunswick
CCL Design-Brunswick operates an establishment with approximately 92 full-time equivalent workers in BRUNSWICK, OH, classified under the Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) industry (NAICS 322220). Across 4 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 8 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.3 for Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper), CCL Design-Brunswick's workforce experiences 66% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 4 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating CCL Design-Brunswick as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from CCL Design-Brunswick's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 322220 - Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 135,143 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CCL Design-Brunswick (this establishment) | 2.17 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg |
| 0 industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 322220 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by CCL Design-Brunswick to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2021: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on CCL Design-Brunswick's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 66% of the Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) benchmark, CCL Design-Brunswick reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Coating purchased papers for nonpackaging applications (except photosensitive paper) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CCL Design-Brunswick's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has CCL Design-Brunswick reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.