Correctional institutions · California

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064

Elk Grove, CA · ~161 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade B.

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064: 2.1 TCR = 66% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 safety composite

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2022→2024

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 injury rate improved

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.8 in 2022 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Elk Grove, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/73
  • PHOTO Marion Correctional …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marion Correctional Treatment Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 averages 2.1 TCR (66% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 TCR series: 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.2

Where CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 73 Correctional institutions employers in California.

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 (161 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064
CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 (161 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

CDCR CCHCS Northern Region - 064 has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.8 1.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CA · Elk Grove

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 134 employers in Elk Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marion Correctional Treatment Center 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USMCFP Springfield 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Corrections (30) 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Valle Sabbia, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Espinal FLC 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Avocado Corporation 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-SONGS Station 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - Sacramento 2,924 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 601 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CCHCS - 042 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - ELK GROVE 1,404 FTE
NAT-TCR Fehrenbacher Cabinets, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Stamping, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Armada - Romeoville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest, Inc. dba The Fairmont Skilled Nursing and Therapy 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Greensboro- Libraries 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE McNaughten Pointe Nursing Home 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propulsion Technologies International 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardner Inc OH 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.