Mechanical contractors · Kansas

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

Kansas City, KS · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mechanical contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 106% of Mechanical contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. safety composite

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2019

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. injury rate improved

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 3.8 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Kansas City, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 106% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #31/53
  • PHOTO DiGesare Mechanical …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DiGesare Mechanical Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (106% of the Mechanical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Mechanical contractors establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 53 Mechanical contractors employers in Kansas.

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (84 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

CDI Industrial and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. has more employees than the Mechanical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · KS · Kansas City

5,793 Mechanical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 367 employers in Kansas City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DiGesare Mechanical Incorporated 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinetics Mechanical Service, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Priority Mechanical Contrators LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WC QFS SANFORD 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE McCarty Dairy, LLC. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCarthy-Castle Joint Venture, Tomahawk Creek WWTF 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rest & Water 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nettles Construction Solutions, Inc. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKC6 3,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKC6 2,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfax Assembly and Stamping 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTER 1,091 FTE
NAT-TCR Richland County CUSD #1 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR A.W. Hastings & Co., LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Interface Communications 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lynwood Healthcare Center 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6340-VIKING-WI005 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&W Caulking Applicators, Inc 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Addison IL 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.