Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · Texas

CDM Smith - NEWPP

Humble, TX · ~60 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CDM Smith - NEWPP runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade A.

CDM Smith - NEWPP: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CDM Smith - NEWPP safety composite

CDM Smith - NEWPP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CDM Smith - NEWPP: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

CDM Smith - NEWPP's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Humble, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/194
  • PHOTO Utility Maintenance …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CDM Smith - NEWPP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CDM Smith - NEWPP averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CDM Smith - NEWPP TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where CDM Smith - NEWPP falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 194 Construction management, water employers in Texas.

CDM Smith - NEWPP (60 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CDM Smith - NEWPP
CDM Smith - NEWPP (60 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

CDM Smith - NEWPP has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Humble

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Humble, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCL Construction, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFIC TRENCHLESS INC. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 1 Complex 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACRT, Inc. Arlington TX 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VES Survey International 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAHCC0170 IAH - CARGO 2,067 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAHCX9575 IAH - UPS B19575 1,699 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hermann Northeast Hospital 958 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU1 894 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Compass Johnstown 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Compass HQ 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Division of Business Services 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northeast Academy 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corrigan Moving and Storage Co 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn - Wichita East I35/Green Mill Restaurant 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Composites One LLC - Rock Hill 465 E Springdale 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.