Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Kansas

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC

Wichita, KS · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC safety composite

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 6.02× in 2024

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC's TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2019 to 3.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #1/14
  • PHOTO CDM Smith - NEWPP
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDM Smith - NEWPP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 14 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Kansas.

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC (48 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC
Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC (48 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · KS · Wichita

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDM Smith - NEWPP 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCL Construction, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFIC TRENCHLESS INC. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Southland Service Center 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCullough Excavation, Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linaweaver Construction, Inc. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ron Weers 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Kiekert USA, Inc (R&D Location) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Topcu Tile + Stone 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ottawa County - James Street Campus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 00515 Hunter Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Max Coating, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE AIRCRAFT GEAR CORPORATION - Plant 1 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE FTG Texas 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imperial Metal Products Company 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.