Water system storage tank and tower construction · Kentucky

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc.

Henderson, KY · ~93 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water system storage tank and tower construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. safety composite

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2020

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Henderson, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/29
  • PHOTO CDM Smith - NEWPP
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDM Smith - NEWPP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Water system storage tank and tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Water system storage tank and establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 29 Water system storage tank and employers in Kentucky.

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. (93 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc.
Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. (93 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Pittsburg Tank & Tower Maintenance Co., Inc. has more employees than the Water system storage tank and tower cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · KY · Henderson

1,614 Water system storage tank and tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 82 employers in Henderson, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDM Smith - NEWPP 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utility Maintenance Contractors LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCL Construction, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFIC TRENCHLESS INC. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kelley Beekeeping Company 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE WARE Kentucky 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meuth Construction 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Penn - FPD 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gibbs Die Casting 995 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital main campus 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Henderson Hospital 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 694 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Surface Chemistry Fort Worth 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AK Steel - Middletown Works 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bernard Chaus inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville CSC - Lifepoint 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASI Durant 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ophthalmology Surgery Center of Dallas 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE C/P Starbound 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Resthaven Maple Woods 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.