Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan
Cedar Cove Assisted Living
Cedarville, MI · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Cedar Cove Assisted Living runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.
Cedar Cove Assisted Living: 12.2 TCR = 322% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Cedar Cove Assisted Living safety composite
Cedar Cove Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
35/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 12.23 per 100 workers
Safer than 21% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 4.7 per 100 workers
Safer than 39% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−21.6
2016→2021
Cedar Cove Assisted Living injury rate improved
Cedar Cove Assisted Living's TCR fell 21.6 from 26.3 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=26.3 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=15.6 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=9.0 · 2021=4.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623312 · Cedarville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 322% of ind
- DART 4.7 DART
- RANK #170/201
- PHOTO Missoula AL MC Care …
- BOOK 6y book
- INJ 15 inj
- SIZE ~31 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Missoula AL MC Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →
Cedar Cove Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Cedar Cove Assisted Living
12.2 TCR
- Missoula AL MC
Missoula AL MC Care Properties, LLC
12.2 TCR
- 10349
10349
12.2 TCR
- 10584
10584
12.2 TCR
- EB Care at wes
EB Care at west babylon
12.2 TCR
What this shows Cedar Cove Assisted Living averages 12.2 TCR (322% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).
Cedar Cove Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=26.3 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=15.6 · 2019=13.5 · 2020=9 · 2021=4.7 · BLS 3.8
Where Cedar Cove Assisted Living falls in its industry
6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishmentsSafer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.
Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.
Cedar Cove Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 13.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 15.6 | 7.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 26.3 | 17.5 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623312 · MI · Cedarville
6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Missoula AL MC Care Properties, LLC | 12.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 10349 | 12.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 10584 | 12.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | EB Care at west babylon | 12.2 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Schwartz Greenhouse, Inc. | 31 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Electric Production | 31 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | R.B. Satkowiak's City Sewer Cleaners | 31 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Melching Inc. | 31 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 6273_14715 | 37 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Pilgram Gardens | 12.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Hilton Garden Inn Iowa City Downtown University | 12.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Windsor Post-Acute Healthcare Center of Modesto | 12.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | 900 Riggenbach Road | 12.2 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | The Colonnade of Carrollwood | 31 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Portland Fasteners | 31 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | MVRBC - Cedar Rapids West | 31 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 4769-942-Pottery Barn | 31 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.