Retirement homes with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Pilgram Gardens

Philadelphia, PA · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pilgram Gardens runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Pilgram Gardens: 12.2 TCR = 188% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pilgram Gardens safety composite

Pilgram Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pilgram Gardens: 11.4 → 21.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2021

Pilgram Gardens's TCR rose 10.2 from 11.4 in 2016 to 21.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.2 · 188% of ind

  • DART 14.4 DART
  • RANK #609/754
  • PHOTO Maplecrest Nursing H…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maplecrest Nursing Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pilgram Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pilgram Gardens averages 12.2 TCR (188% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pilgram Gardens TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=21.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Pilgram Gardens falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #609 safest of 754 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Pennsylvania.

Pilgram Gardens (41 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pilgram Gardens
Pilgram Gardens (41 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Pilgram Gardens has fewer employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.6 14.4 5 1 0
2020 12.1 9.1 3 1 0
2019 12.1 9.1 4 0 0
2018 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2016 11.4 11.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Philadelphia

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maplecrest Nursing Home 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Post Acute Care Center of Hayward 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Post-Acute Healthcare Center of Modesto 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Valley Care Center 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SpecialtyEgg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Mill & Fabricating Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Environmental, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Cove Assisted Living 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Iowa City Downtown University 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Post-Acute Healthcare Center of Modesto 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 900 Riggenbach Road 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Aa Admiral Club Dfw Term a 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Colgate Palmolive-Nt Custodial 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Cahokia Unit Sd # 187 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sharp Coronado Hospital - Hskp 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.