Developing and producing prototypes for guided missile and space vehicle engines · Texas

Cedar Park Facility

Cedar Park, TX · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Park Facility runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Developing and producing prototypes for guided missile and space vehicle engines workplace, earning a grade A.

Cedar Park Facility: 0.3 TCR = 8% of Developing and producing prototypes for guided missile and space vehicle engines BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Park Facility safety composite

Cedar Park Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Park Facility: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 0.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Cedar Park Facility's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336415 · Cedar Park, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Orbital ATK - Elkton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orbital ATK - Elkton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Park Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Park Facility averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Developing and producing prototypes for guided missile and space vehicle engines BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Cedar Park Facility TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Cedar Park Facility falls in its industry

48 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Developing and producing proto employers in Texas.

Cedar Park Facility (110 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 374 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Park Facility
Cedar Park Facility (110 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 374 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Cedar Park Facility has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336415 · TX · Cedar Park

48 Developing and producing prototypes for guided missile and space vehicle engines employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Cedar Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orbital ATK - Elkton 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison ORBITEC - WM1 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerojet Rocketdyne - West Palm Beach 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Huntsville AMF 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 761 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZWIF 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caraday of Corpus Christi 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Park Regional Medical Center 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2991 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2991 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2342 - Cedar Park 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarksburg 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcon @ MPC Catlettsburg 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SandRidge Operating - Corporate Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lyman Products 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE DENTSPLY Sirona - West Plant 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harnett Healthcare Group LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ayden Court Nursing & Rehab 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.