Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

Cedar Springs

Decatur, AL · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Springs runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Springs: 11.9 TCR = 313% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Springs safety composite

Cedar Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Springs: 7.8 → 15.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.22× in 2018

Cedar Springs's TCR rose 8.1 from 7.8 in 2017 to 15.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Decatur, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 313% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #51/64
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Springs averages 11.9 TCR (313% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Springs TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=15.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Springs falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

Cedar Springs (48 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Springs
Cedar Springs (48 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cedar Springs has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 15.9 2.6 6 0 0
2017 7.8 5.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Decatur

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 239 employers in Decatur, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY NASHUA OPERATION LLC 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Place of Mooresville 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Harbor Properties, LLC 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Waterford Place 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elkmont GP Egg Depot 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Auburn Office 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & I Enclousres 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOHNSONKREIS Construction 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain - Decatur 1,450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur processing plant 885 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Decatur 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur Fresh Plant 671 FTE
NAT-TCR RSG of NJ - Mt Laurel 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Assisi 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago (Ilcws) 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester (Nyroc) 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Camco 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/T Constellation 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/T Defender 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.