Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Missouri

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington

Farmington, MO · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington: 1.4 TCR = 37% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington safety composite

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2023→2024

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington injury rate improved

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Farmington, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/85
  • PHOTO CHAPMAN PLACE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHAPMAN PLACE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington averages 1.4 TCR (37% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington TCR series: 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 85 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Missouri.

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington
Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedarhrust Living, LLC - Farmington has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MO · Farmington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 59 employers in Farmington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHAPMAN PLACE 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sequoia Living 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Grand McKinney, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southfield Village 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Macklind 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & A Electric Power Cooperative 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ozark Electric Cooperative- Mount Vernon Office 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warrensburg Service Center 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Startek - Farmington, MO 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Tool Group - Farmington 608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkland Health Center, Liberty Street 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkland Health Center, Liberty St. 538 FTE
NAT-TCR Smith Hauling Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR King Industries Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RLCC High School 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern States Material Handling 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MONSON-MA23 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocotillo Service Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Construction Co., Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hope 10163 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.