Natural Gas Distribution · Texas

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston

Houston, TX · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Natural Gas Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston: 3.2 TCR = 269% of Natural Gas Distribution BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston safety composite

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston: 0.0 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 3.15× in 2024

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston's TCR rose 11.3 from 0.0 in 2020 to 11.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 269% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #66/97
  • PHOTO ONG ER N TUL MET SC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ONG ER N TUL MET SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston averages 3.2 TCR (269% of the Natural Gas Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 1.2

Where CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston falls in its industry

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 97 Natural Gas Distribution employers in Texas.

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston (95 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston
CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston (95 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston has more employees than the Natural Gas Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 10.2 9 1 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · TX · Houston

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ONG ER N TUL MET SC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OR-Central/Exley 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Tech - Operations 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UGI Utilities Bethlehem 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacesetter Homes, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockin R Construction 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Concrete Buildings 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE S Thomas Construction, LLC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 628 - Lawton 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Youngstown OH FXFE-YNG 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Avondale Schools 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fleming Feed & Grain 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zima Corporation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlen's Drywall Co Inc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Village of St. Edward at Wadsworth 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.