Electric power distribution systems · Minnesota

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative

Jordan, MN · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative runs at 476% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative: 5.7 TCR = 476% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative safety composite

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2019→2024

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative injury rate improved

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative's TCR fell 8.7 from 10.8 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jordan, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 476% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #62/85
  • PHOTO Black Hills Electric…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Black Hills Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative averages 5.7 TCR (476% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2019=10.8 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 85 Electric power distribution sy employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative (95 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative
Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative (95 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 4.5 0.0 4 0 0
2022 5.5 1.1 5 0 1
2019 10.8 8.6 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Jordan

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Jordan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Black Hills Electric Cooperative 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STOCKTON OFFICE & SERVICE CTR 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berlin Office 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Utilities Commission 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE A.S. King Plant 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Bear Lake Service Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE ONE WAY WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Drews Total Concrete 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jordan Public Schools, ISD #717 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.M. Hentges & Sons Inc 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR By the Yard, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minger Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Michael Lewis Company 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 440 East Stateline Rd-Ste A Southaven MS 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Master Millwork, Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GATX - Terre Haute 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Construction, LLC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlen's Drywall Co Inc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zima Corporation 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.