Specialty transformers, electric, manufacturing · Arkansas

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant

White Hall, AR · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Specialty transformers, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Specialty transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant safety composite

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2021

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant injury rate improved

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.2 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.2 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335311 · White Hall, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Hitachi Energy USA, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hitachi Energy USA, inc. Earth City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Specialty transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant falls in its industry

141 Specialty transformers, electr establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Specialty transformers, electr employers in Arkansas.

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant (70 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant
Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant (70 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Central Moloney, Inc.--Components Plant has fewer employees than the Specialty transformers, electric, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335311 · AR · White Hall

141 Specialty transformers, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 11 employers in White Hall, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Energy USA, inc. Earth City 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Division 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Louis - 4350 Semple Avenue 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPX Transformer Solutions, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Little Rock West Markham 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowell 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ditta Enterprises, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE PC Hardware 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Bluff Jeff Pkwy Plant 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin Rivers Pine Bluff, LLC 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waters of White Hall 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Bluff 112 FTE
NAT-TCR SJC San Jose - 1800 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR North Alabama Construction 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Holy Cross Catholic School 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Magelssen Elementary School 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Central Region 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE ELP Airport - 342 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seacliff Inn Aptos 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE T518 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.