Provincial parks · New York

Central Park Conservancy

Name: Central Park Conservancy Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

New York, NY · ~353 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 11.0
Avg TCR: 3.1
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Park Conservancy runs at 355% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Provincial parks workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Park Conservancy: 11.0 TCR = 355% of Provincial parks BLS 3.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Park Conservancy safety composite

Central Park Conservancy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 11.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers
DART rate: F 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Park Conservancy: 9.1 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 15.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Central Park Conservancy's TCR rose 2.8 from 9.1 in 2018 to 11.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 712190 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 355% of ind

DART 7.1 DART
RANK #4/5
PHOTO The Elephant Sanctua…
BOOK 7y book
INJ 193 inj
SIZE ~353 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

PONTIAC LAKE R

11.2
This site

11
The Elephant S

11
Champaign Coun

10.7
Form 300A Kenl

10.7

What this shows Central Park Conservancy averages 11.0 TCR (355% of the Provincial parks BLS benchmark).

Central Park Conservancy TCR series: 2018=9.1 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=15.7 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 3.1

Where Central Park Conservancy falls in its industry

126 Provincial parks establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.7.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Provincial parks employers in New York.

Central Park Conservancy (353 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 6.7

Central Park Conservancy has more employees than the Provincial parks median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2024	11.9	7.1	40	2
2023	13.6	9.1	43	2
2022	6.7	3.5	18	5
2021	15.7	14.5	24	2
2020	4.5	4.5	12	1
2019	15.6	9.8	33	2
2018	9.1	4.8	23	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

712190 · NY · New York

126 Provincial parks employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee	HOHENWALD, TN	11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PONTIAC LAKE RCRTN AREA - DNR	WATERFORD, MI	11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Champaign County Forest Preserve District	MAHOMET, IL	10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Form 300A Kenlake State Resort PARK	HARDIN, KY	10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	IIMAK (International Imaging Materials, Inc.)	AMHERST	353 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NY15530	NEW YORK	353 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Morningside Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	BRONX	353 FTE
STATE-SIZE	InterContinental New York Barclay	NEW YORK	353 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NYU Grossman School of Medicine	New York	16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM)	New York	14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NYU Langone Hospitals	New York	12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mount Sinai Medical Center	New York	11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR	Gainesville Fl	Gainesville, FL	11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Montano Concrete Corp	Pueblo, CO	11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Airpark Plastics	Standish, MI	11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	DEP003 - BOR-North West District	Marlborough, CT	11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Miami Distribution	Miami, FL	353 FTE
NAT-SIZE	John Deere Coffeyville Works	Coffeyville, KS	353 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa	San Diego, CA	353 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Harrisburg / Jonestown Terminal	Jonestown, PA	353 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.