Industry profile · NAICS 712190

Conservation areas

Workplace injury rates across 138 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

138
Employers
7.4
Avg TCR
3.1
BLS benchmark
3,383
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Conservation areas average 7.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.1.

7.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.1
BLS national benchmark
138
employers reporting
3,383
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Conservation areas Safety Data Reveals

The Conservation areas sector (NAICS 712190) encompasses 138 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,383 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.1 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 7.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Conservation areas that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Parks & Recreation - Parks Maintenance Div Sioux City, IA F 28.7
City Of Sacramento-Park Operations Roll-Up (190013) Sacramento, CA F 24.5
Parks & Rec Maintenance Sioux City, IA F 20.2
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Parks & Recreation - Cherokee Park Louisville, KY F 19.3
City of Middletown - Parks & Recreation Maintenance Middletown, CT F 19.0
Kendall County Forest Preserve District Yorkville, IL F 19.0
Spring Farm Cares Clinton, NY F 17.9
Metro Parks- Blue Lake Troutdale, OR F 17.5
Belle Isle Park - Dnr Detroit, MI F 17.3
CCFPD Mahomet, IL F 16.2
PARKS - County Cir Santa Rosa, CA F 15.6
Island Lake Rcrtn Area - Dnr Brighton, MI F 15.4
East Bay Regional Park District Oakland, CA F 13.4
00000007 Parks Recreation Department Santa Cruz, CA F 13.2
Passaic County Parks Department Wayne, NJ F 13.1
Parks and Recreation Kahului, HI F 12.6
Centennial Enterprises, Inc. Manitou Springs, CO F 12.4
Maymont Foundation Richmond, VA F 12.3
Seattle Parks and Recreation Seattle, WA F 11.4
Macon County Conservation District Decatur, IL F 11.3
Pontiac Lake Rcrtn Area - Dnr Waterford, MI F 11.2
Central Park Conservancy New York, NY F 11.0
The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee Hohenwald, TN F 11.0
Champaign County Forest Preserve District Mahomet, IL F 10.7
Form 300A Kenlake State Resort PARK Hardin, KY F 10.7
City of Asheville - Parks and Recreation Asheville, NC F 10.6
9025-34 Conservation Toddville, IA F 10.6
Hrt Mtague Trl Slvr Lk Pk -Dnr Mears, MI F 10.4
New York State Parks Allegany Region Salamanca, NY F 10.3
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government- Parks and Recreation- Central Services Louisville, KY F 10.3
Pier 55 inc. dba Little Island New York, NY F 10.3
Sea Life Orlando Orlando, FL F 10.2
Moaning Caverns Adventure Park Vallecito, CA F 9.8
Recreation Parks and Open Spaces Norfolk, VA F 9.4
Bass Riv Rec Hffmas St Pk -Dnr Muskegon, MI F 9.3
Parks Maint-General-Area-3 Henderson, NV F 9.0
PARKS - Lakeville Petaluma, CA F 9.0
Scissortail Park Foundation Oklahoma City, OK F 8.5
DEP032 - BOR-Parks-Osbornedale Derby, CT F 8.3
Natural Bridge Caverns LLC San Antonio, TX F 8.3
City of Kingman Parks & Recreation Kingman, AZ F 8.2
Wm Mitchell State Park - Dnr Cadillac, MI F 8.1
The City of Bloomington - Parks, Rec, and Cultural Arts Bloomington, IL F 8.0
Park Distrit of Highland Park 636 Highland Park, IL F 7.9
Parks & Recreation San Diego, CA F 7.8
Waterloo St Rcrtn Area - Dnr Chelsea, MI F 7.8
Ludington State Park - Dnr Ludington, MI F 7.7
Three Rivers Park District Plymouth, MN F 7.7
Lockport Township Park District Lockport, IL F 7.6
OC Parks - South Coastal Operations Dana Point, CA F 7.4
Page 1 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Conservation areas?

This sector averages 7.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.1 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.