Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · North Carolina

Central Production Management -Est

Warsaw, NC · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Production Management -Est runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Production Management -Est: 3.9 TCR = 87% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Production Management -Est safety composite

Central Production Management -Est scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Production Management -Est: 3.6 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2024

Central Production Management -Est's TCR rose 1.2 from 3.6 in 2022 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Warsaw, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Pocahontas Warehouse
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pocahontas Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Central Production Management -Est in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Production Management -Est averages 3.9 TCR (87% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Production Management -Est TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Production Management -Est falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in North Carolina.

Central Production Management -Est (62 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Production Management -Est
Central Production Management -Est (62 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Central Production Management -Est has more employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 3.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · NC · Warsaw

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 20 employers in Warsaw, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pocahontas Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Grove 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR M001 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boseman Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Durham 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville - New Bern 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Asheville 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Villari Bros. Foods 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Pork Company 2 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Villari Foods 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Pork Company II 169 FTE
NAT-TCR Maryville Plasma Center 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4120 Mechanicsburg 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Batesville Tool & Die SC INC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR All Care Health Center 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE MADO Healthcare Old Town 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at NAH Flagstaff Medical Center 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at Laredo Medical Center 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Touch Logistics Company 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.