Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Indiana

Samtec

New Albany, IN · ~1,176 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samtec runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Samtec: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samtec safety composite

Samtec scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Samtec held a steady TCR band

Samtec's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.1 in 2018 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · New Albany, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Amphenol - Valley Gr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~1,176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amphenol - Valley Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Samtec in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samtec averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samtec TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Samtec falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Indiana.

Samtec (1,176 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Samtec
Samtec (1,176 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Samtec has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.2 11 2 0
2023 1.3 0.3 7 3 0
2021 1.4 0.5 7 12 0
2020 1.0 0.5 8 4 0
2019 0.8 0.3 8 1 0
2018 1.1 0.7 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · IN · New Albany

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 88 employers in New Albany, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amphenol - Valley Green 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vanguard EMS, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detoronics 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PPC Broadband, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cummins Technical Center 1,174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hancock Wellness Center and Medical Office McCordsville 1,178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transportation Department 1,167 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN - Nike Returns 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Floyd 1,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYX New Albany 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cenveo Discount Labels 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brook and Whittle, Ltd (Discount Labels) - New Albany 496 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawkinsville 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR O&E Matias Electrical Service, LLC. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne Spencer Contracting 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Grove Truck Stop 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hospital For Special Care 1,176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Samsung Electronics Home Appliances America LLC 1,176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palisades Medical Center 1,176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novant Health Rowan Medical Center 1,176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.