Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) · Massachusetts

Champion City Transit Management, Inc.

Brockton, MA · ~109 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade D.

Champion City Transit Management, Inc.: 6.6 TCR = 147% of Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. safety composite

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2018→2023

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. injury rate improved

Champion City Transit Management, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.5 from 10.6 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Brockton, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO 6283_14922
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6283_14922 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Champion City Transit Management, Inc. averages 6.6 TCR (147% of the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. TCR series: 2018=10.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Champion City Transit Management, Inc. falls in its industry

332 Bus transit systems (except mi establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Bus transit systems (except mi employers in Massachusetts.

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Champion City Transit Management, Inc.
Champion City Transit Management, Inc. (109 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Champion City Transit Management, Inc. has fewer employees than the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2022 6.6 5.5 6 0 0
2019 7.3 6.2 7 0 0
2018 10.6 5.3 5 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · MA · Brockton

332 Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 111 employers in Brockton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6283_14922 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rides Mass Transit District, Marion 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vonlane LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6091-461 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electronic Environments Co 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rachaels Food Corp 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acorda Therapeutics 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&E Tool Company 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROCKTON HOSPITAL 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAMSI 1,393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brockton Neighborhood Health Center 639 FTE
NAT-TCR premier truck group of chattanooga 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Culpeper District Bridge Crews 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeview Sawmill 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McIntyre Construction Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Briarfield Manor 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Five Star Laundry Chicago 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hope / Spectrum Health CC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethel Ct 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.