Highway Repair, maintenance · Virginia

Culpeper District Bridge Crews

Culpeper, VA · ~45 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Culpeper District Bridge Crews runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway Repair, maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Culpeper District Bridge Crews: 6.6 TCR = 237% of Highway Repair, maintenance BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Culpeper District Bridge Crews safety composite

Culpeper District Bridge Crews scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Culpeper District Bridge Crews: 4.8 → 12.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2023

Culpeper District Bridge Crews's TCR rose 8.1 from 4.8 in 2017 to 12.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Culpeper, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 237% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #109/141
  • PHOTO Tony DePaul and Son
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tony DePaul and Son (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Culpeper District Bridge Crews in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Culpeper District Bridge Crews averages 6.6 TCR (237% of the Highway Repair, maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Culpeper District Bridge Crews TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=12.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Culpeper District Bridge Crews falls in its industry

4,078 Highway Repair, maintenance establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 141 Highway Repair, maintenance employers in Virginia.

Culpeper District Bridge Crews (45 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Culpeper District Bridge Crews
Culpeper District Bridge Crews (45 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Culpeper District Bridge Crews has fewer employees than the Highway Repair, maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.9 10.3 5 0 0
2022 7.9 5.3 3 0 0
2021 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 7.7 2.6 3 0 0
2018 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · VA · Culpeper

4,078 Highway Repair, maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 67 employers in Culpeper, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tony DePaul and Son 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RSS Akron Beltway Joint Venture 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro-Technologies, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliance Construction 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE VA09S-SEL-VIRGINIA SERVICE ROOM 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREENSVILLE COUNTY POWER STATION 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmville Public Works 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Culpeper County Public Schools 1,362 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Culpeper Medical Center 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Culpeper 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health UVA Health System Culpeper Medical Center 659 FTE
NAT-TCR Champion City Transit Management, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR premier truck group of chattanooga 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeview Sawmill 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McIntyre Construction Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westco Roofing Co. Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davenport Service Center 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Aire Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neon Electric Corporation 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.