Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers · Georgia

premier truck group of chattanooga

Ringgold, GA · ~100 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

premier truck group of chattanooga runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

premier truck group of chattanooga: 6.6 TCR = 301% of Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

premier truck group of chattanooga safety composite

premier truck group of chattanooga scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2023

premier truck group of chattanooga injury rate improved

premier truck group of chattanooga's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 21.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423110 · Ringgold, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 301% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/77
  • PHOTO MANHEIM MILWAUKEE
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MANHEIM MILWAUKEE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

premier truck group of chattanooga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows premier truck group of chattanooga averages 6.6 TCR (301% of the Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

premier truck group of chattanooga TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=4.3 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where premier truck group of chattanooga falls in its industry

1,333 Trucks, road, merchant wholesa establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 77 Trucks, road, merchant wholesa employers in Georgia.

premier truck group of chattanooga (100 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate premier truck group of chattanooga
premier truck group of chattanooga (100 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3

premier truck group of chattanooga has more employees than the Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 21.4 21.4 6 12 0
2019 4.3 2.1 4 0 0
2018 5.2 4.2 5 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423110 · GA · Ringgold

1,333 Trucks, road, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 56 employers in Ringgold, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MANHEIM MILWAUKEE 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Motor Power Equipment Co. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4598-RTC KANSAS CITY 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4598-RTC SALT LAKE CITY 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Moultrie 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Providence Group of GA 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Kitchen - Decatur 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Utilities of GA Ince 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Physical Therapy Ringgold 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primary Care Ringgold 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primary Care S Ringgold 6,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant RP 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Champion City Transit Management, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Culpeper District Bridge Crews 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeview Sawmill 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McIntyre Construction Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE SC Pet Food Solutions 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morristown 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendly House, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Young Galvanizing, Inc. 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.