Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation

MILLERSBURG, PA · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate — safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace — earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
2
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).

Injury rate over time

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.

Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623312.

-1012345 20222024 03.8 Industry benchmarkCharles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623312.

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation has an average TCR of 1.9, which is 51% of the industry average (3.8) for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities. This is better than average.

Safety Insights for Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation

Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation operates an establishment with approximately 66 full-time equivalent workers in MILLERSBURG, PA, classified under the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities industry (NAICS 623312). Across 2 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 2 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.8 for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities, Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's workforce experiences 51% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 2 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623312 — Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.

DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 91,131 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation (this establishment) 1.94 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Homes for the elderly without nursing care industry avg 3.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 623312
Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) 5.06 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's reported OSHA injury record — strong versus its Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 51% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities benchmark, Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation reports fewer injuries than typical peers — still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation's safety grade?
Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.8 for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) — the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year — against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation reported?
Charles P & Margaret E Polk Foundation has reported 2 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2024, 2022). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial