Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · New York

Fort Washington Men's Shelter

New York, NY · ~119 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Washington Men's Shelter runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade F.

Fort Washington Men's Shelter: 8.1 TCR = 213% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Washington Men's Shelter safety composite

Fort Washington Men's Shelter scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Washington Men's Shelter: 3.7 → 16.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Fort Washington Men's Shelter's TCR rose 12.5 from 3.7 in 2016 to 16.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 213% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #88/107
  • PHOTO Laraway Youth & Fami…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Laraway Youth & Family Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Fort Washington Men's Shelter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Washington Men's Shelter averages 8.1 TCR (213% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Washington Men's Shelter TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=3.5 · 2023=9.1 · 2024=16.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Fort Washington Men's Shelter falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 107 Individual and family social s employers in New York.

Fort Washington Men's Shelter (119 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Washington Men's Shelter
Fort Washington Men's Shelter (119 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Fort Washington Men's Shelter has more employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.2 0.0 10 0 0
2023 9.1 0.9 10 0 0
2017 3.5 2.3 2 1 0
2016 3.7 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NY · New York

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Laraway Youth & Family Services 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Preble Street Resource Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3150 Gershwin Drive 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruth Dropkin Head Start 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JD Consulting LLC DBA JD Traditional Industries 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE E-J Electric, LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swimwear Anywhere, Inc. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE HV Coral Graphics 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Denver Cold Storage, Inc Warehouse 2 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles River Laboratories 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mr. Rooter Plumbing 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mastercraft Industries Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ideal Setech, LLC 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlottesville - Transit 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market of Choice #2 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE PowerWorks Electric 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.