Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing · North Carolina

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations

Charlotte, NC · ~641 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations safety composite

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations held a steady TCR band

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.6 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333991 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Arconic Fastening Sy…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~641 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arconic Fastening Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlotte Manufacturing Operations averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Charlotte Manufacturing Operations falls in its industry

57 Handtools, power-driven, manuf establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Handtools, power-driven, manuf employers in North Carolina.

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations (641 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlotte Manufacturing Operations
Charlotte Manufacturing Operations (641 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Charlotte Manufacturing Operations has more employees than the Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.6 0.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333991 · NC · Charlotte

57 Handtools, power-driven, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arconic Fastening Systems 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanley Black and Decker 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Customer Service Group Carson City Repair Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Tools and Lifting 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Greensboro- Fire Department 641 FTE
STATE-SIZE IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Solutions : IS - MFG US - Mebane, NC 642 FTE
STATE-SIZE PactivEvergreen Mooresville 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Washington (Dupont Road) 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Homans Associates LLC 1240 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell NWIL 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadway Office Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Procter & Gamble Paper Products 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Services (Smith County) 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : North Hatfield, MA (PDC) 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant 641 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.