Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Virginia

Charlottesville-Human Services

Charlottesville, VA · ~61 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlottesville-Human Services runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade A.

Charlottesville-Human Services: 1.9 TCR = 49% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlottesville-Human Services safety composite

Charlottesville-Human Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2019

Charlottesville-Human Services injury rate improved

Charlottesville-Human Services's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Charlottesville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/20
  • PHOTO Easterseals Joliet R…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Easterseals Joliet Region, Inc. Barney (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Charlottesville-Human Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlottesville-Human Services averages 1.9 TCR (49% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlottesville-Human Services TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Charlottesville-Human Services falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 20 Individual and family social s employers in Virginia.

Charlottesville-Human Services (61 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlottesville-Human Services
Charlottesville-Human Services (61 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Charlottesville-Human Services has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 4.9 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · VA · Charlottesville

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Easterseals Joliet Region, Inc. Barney 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upper East Tennessee Human Development Agency, 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jay County Behavioral Services 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Planned Parenthood of Greater NY- Bronx Health Center 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PGEC HQ 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southern Virginia 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polu Kai Services - Falls Curch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR A C & Associates 35-1967636 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Newport Aquarium 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hormel Foods Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Humana Louisville Waterside 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greg H Carpenter Concrete, Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Southwest District : SVC-Albuquerque NM-USA 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rice Packaging, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mesa Repair Center 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.