Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200)

Dallas, TX · ~1,609 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade A.

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200): 2.2 TCR = 29% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) safety composite

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) held a steady TCR band

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200)'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.1 in 2020 to 2.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #60/520
  • PHOTO MERCY HOSPITAL CARTH…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~1,609 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) averages 2.2 TCR (29% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) TCR series: 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 520 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) (1,609 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200)
Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) (1,609 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.3 1.6 30 3 0
2020 2.1 2.1 31 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Dallas

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2643-16130001-161306 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centro Medico y Medicina Integradas 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAIN-FRMC1-MAIN CAMPUS 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richardson Methodist Medical Center (MRMC-600) 1,610 FTE
STATE-SIZE METHODIST CHARLTON MEDICAL CENTER 1,612 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXRTH - HASLET HUB 1,613 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Decatur ADM Mechanical Fabrication 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Whse 508 - 91st Ave. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ruan Transport Corporation T-024 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TN - Altria 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coast King Packing, LLC California 1,608 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ups Technology Headquarters & Datacenter (Njrar) 1,610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nal Muscle Shoals Plant 1,610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 1,607 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.