Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Methodist Charlton Medical Center

Dallas, TX · ~1,612 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Methodist Charlton Medical Center runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade A.

Methodist Charlton Medical Center: 3.4 TCR = 45% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Methodist Charlton Medical Center safety composite

Methodist Charlton Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Methodist Charlton Medical Center: 3.2 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Methodist Charlton Medical Center's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.2 in 2023 to 3.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 3.4 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #150/520
  • PHOTO Peterson Regional Me…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~1,612 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peterson Regional Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Methodist Charlton Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Methodist Charlton Medical Center averages 3.4 TCR (45% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Methodist Charlton Medical Center TCR series: 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Methodist Charlton Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 520 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Methodist Charlton Medical Center (1,612 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Methodist Charlton Medical Center
Methodist Charlton Medical Center (1,612 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Methodist Charlton Medical Center has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 1.8 55 0 0
2023 3.2 2.5 44 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Dallas

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peterson Regional Medical Center 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHMG PHOR Clinics 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avera St. Benedicts Health Center 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE TXRTH - HASLET HUB 1,613 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richardson Methodist Medical Center (MRMC-600) 1,610 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlton Methodist Medical Center (MCMC-200) 1,609 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division 1,618 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Jefferson Elementary 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 3308-Weinberger Hauling 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Pearl River 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 327 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACV Auctions Inc. - Headquarters 1,612 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm Fresh Foods, LLC 1,612 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmhurst , IL - 01 1,612 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist South 1,613 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.