Process piping installation · Oregon

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc.

Portland, OR · ~431 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Process piping installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Process piping installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. safety composite

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. held a steady TCR band

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #12/86
  • PHOTO MacDonald-Miller Fac…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~431 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MacDonald-Miller Facility Solutions, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Process piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Process piping installation establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 86 Process piping installation employers in Oregon.

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. (431 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc.
Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. (431 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. has more employees than the Process piping installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.7 7 0 0
2022 1.7 0.3 8 2 0
2021 1.5 1.1 7 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2018 1.8 0.4 5 0 0
2017 1.1 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OR · Portland

5,793 Process piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MacDonald-Miller Facility Solutions, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAMES L CAYTON ACCOCIATES INC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&B Plumbing 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herbert S. Hiller, a division of The Hiller Companies, Inc. 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE BOARDMAN OR EAST 431 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Plant in Hillsboro 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reser's Fine Foods, Inc. 433 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2927 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Panama City Operations Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sulzer Pump Services (US) Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lotspeich Company Of Florida Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR H&W Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MN100 431 FTE
NAT-SIZE MNDOT District 3 431 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delicato Vineyards - Manteca 431 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC32 431 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.