Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) · Oregon

Ruby Junction Operators

Portland, OR · ~433 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ruby Junction Operators runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) workplace, earning a grade B.

Ruby Junction Operators: 3.3 TCR = 74% of Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ruby Junction Operators safety composite

Ruby Junction Operators scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2022→2024

Ruby Junction Operators injury rate improved

Ruby Junction Operators's TCR fell 3.0 from 4.7 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.7 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/30
  • PHOTO Sumner, WA - 142nd A…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~433 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sumner, WA - 142nd Avenue East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Ruby Junction Operators in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ruby Junction Operators averages 3.3 TCR (74% of the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ruby Junction Operators TCR series: 2022=4.7 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Ruby Junction Operators falls in its industry

421 Commuter transit systems, mixe establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 30 Commuter transit systems, mixe employers in Oregon.

Ruby Junction Operators (433 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ruby Junction Operators
Ruby Junction Operators (433 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Ruby Junction Operators has more employees than the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.5 8 0 0
2023 3.6 1.2 15 0 0
2022 4.7 3.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · OR · Portland

421 Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sumner, WA - 142nd Avenue East 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4056 ELEVATOR ESCALATOR MAINTENANCE 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexandria Rail Yard 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2230 GREEN PINK LINE SUPPORT 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reser's Fine Foods, Inc. 433 FTE
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT SALEM-KEIZER SCH-DIST 24J 433 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert LLC 434 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Mechanical Contractors Inc. 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Maui Ocean Club 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Women's Health Pavilion 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sauk Centre Public Schools 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Services RSH, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Diamond Growers - Salida 433 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smart Facility Office/Manu - Ericsson, Inc 433 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - RSW5 433 FTE
NAT-SIZE NK Parts Main Campus 433 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.