Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing · New Hampshire

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc.

Dover, NH · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 40% of Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. safety composite

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2024

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Dover, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO CA-Rancho Santa Marg…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA-Rancho Santa Margarita (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (40% of the Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. falls in its industry

125 Electricity and electrical sig establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Electricity and electrical sig employers in New Hampshire.

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chauvin Arnoux, Inc.
Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Chauvin Arnoux, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electricity and electrical signal measur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · NH · Dover

125 Electricity and electrical signal measuring instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dover, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA-Rancho Santa Margarita 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loranger International Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tektronix, Inc (13) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ikonix USA 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE H.P. Cummings Construction Company 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Spray Systems, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hampshire Boring Inc dba New England Boring Contractors 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Excavating Corp. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth Douglass Hospital 3,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth-Douglass Hospital 3,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR WDH/CENTRAL AVENUE 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measured Progress 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Temecula 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McDonough Store #1711 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 18 Leigh Fisher 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prospect Airport Services DTW PSA 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Durham, NC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Custom Exteriors & Interiors 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lurvey Landscape Supply - Des Plaines (Wholesale) 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeAngelis Iron Work Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.