Distribution of natural gas · Maryland

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run

Salisbury, MD · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade D.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run: 1.8 TCR = 149% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run safety composite

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run: 1.6 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2020

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.6 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Salisbury, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 149% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO SWG NORTH OPS OFFICE…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SWG NORTH OPS OFFICE 0021-FAC48 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run averages 1.8 TCR (149% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run TCR series: 2019=1.6 · 2020=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Distribution of natural gas employers in Maryland.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run (63 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run (63 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · MD · Salisbury

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SWG NORTH OPS OFFICE 0021-FAC48 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Rock Operations Center AK6H 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHE - Council Bluff W Broadway (IA001) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Gas & Oil 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPL-Centreville 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viskon-Aire Coporation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lighting Retrofit International 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Gunite Construction Company 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : BHM - Birmingham 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR recro gainesville LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Hardwoods Chicago 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MZL Properties Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE C521 Halifax 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : EUG - Eugene 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerby of Santa Rosa Beach 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Div. 156_162 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.