Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · Indiana

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC

Chesterton, IN · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade C.

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC: 4.1 TCR = 108% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC safety composite

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2021→2024

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC injury rate improved

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC's TCR fell 1.8 from 7.4 in 2021 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Chesterton, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 108% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Holzer Meigs Emergen…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holzer Meigs Emergency Room (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chesterton Surgery Center LLC averages 4.1 TCR (108% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC TCR series: 2021=7.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Chesterton Surgery Center LLC falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in Indiana.

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC (39 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Chesterton Surgery Center LLC
Chesterton Surgery Center LLC (39 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Chesterton Surgery Center LLC has fewer employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 7.4 7.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · IN · Chesterton

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 27 employers in Chesterton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holzer Meigs Emergency Room 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandon Healthplex-TGH Emergency Department & Support Services 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PM Pediatrics Germantown 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDI Surgery Center 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urschel 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urschel Laboratories 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000003189 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000001189 167 FTE
NAT-TCR Preston Memorial Hospital 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet Newport 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin Sprocket & Gear 13 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites- Walingford Meriden 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MBCI Phoenix 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altium Packaging - Tampa 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altium Packaging - Phoenix 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altium Packaging - Irwindale 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.