General services departments, government · Iowa

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads

New Hampton, IA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads: 6.3 TCR = 198% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads safety composite

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2022→2024

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads injury rate improved

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads's TCR fell 12.7 from 12.7 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.7 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · New Hampton, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 198% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/34
  • PHOTO Department of Public…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chickasaw County Secondary Roads averages 6.3 TCR (198% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads TCR series: 2022=12.7 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Chickasaw County Secondary Roads falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 34 General services departments, employers in Iowa.

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads (30 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Chickasaw County Secondary Roads
Chickasaw County Secondary Roads (30 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Chickasaw County Secondary Roads has fewer employees than the General services departments, government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2022 12.7 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · IA · New Hampton

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 38 employers in New Hampton, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Department of Public Safety Standards and Training 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ionia County 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 10101 S. Stony Island Ave. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Saginaw 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beck's Mount Pleasant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iowa Laborers 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Keokuk Plant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kading Construction Company Inc 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriMark Corporation 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deb El Iowa Operating LLC 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atek Metal Technologies 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hampton 132 FTE
NAT-TCR ScreenWorks USA Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TheraCare Home Health Lewisville 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Leggett & Platt 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Danco 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spectra Wood Lewistown 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Escape Game Jacksonville LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Group Electric Company, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2021156 - NIH VRC Lab Expansion - Building 40A 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.