Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Michigan

Romulus Division

Romulus, MI · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Romulus Division runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Romulus Division: 4.9 TCR = 148% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Romulus Division safety composite

Romulus Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

Romulus Division injury rate improved

Romulus Division's TCR fell 6.4 from 9.7 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Romulus, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 148% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #143/218
  • PHOTO Hood MFG
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hood MFG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Romulus Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Romulus Division averages 4.9 TCR (148% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Romulus Division TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=7 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Romulus Division falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 218 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Michigan.

Romulus Division (66 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Romulus Division
Romulus Division (66 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Romulus Division has fewer employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 7.0 4.2 5 0 0
2017 6.6 4.0 5 0 0
2016 9.7 6.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MI · Romulus

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 199 employers in Romulus, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hood MFG 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Better Way Products Lebanon 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tigerpoly Mfg., Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Injection Technologies 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frank Rewold and Son, Inc. - Main Branch 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ox Paperboard WP, LLC 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milbocker & Sons Inc 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSM Rochester Hills 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DTW1 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW1 3,502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Romulus Powertrain 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Romulus 1,037 FTE
NAT-TCR ServiceMaster DSI -Downers Grove 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Automotive of York (West) 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcotech - PC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #58 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chief Ethanol Fuels- Hastings 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poultry Service Associates Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at Charlottesville 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Recycling Jacksonville 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.