Employer · Pennsylvania

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM

Pittsburgh, PA · ~87 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM: 1.8 TCR = 61% of industry BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM safety composite

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM: 1.5 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.5 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #89/463
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT MORNINGSID…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM averages 1.8 TCR (61% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM falls in its industry

6,952 industry establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 463 industry employers in Pennsylvania.

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM (87 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM (87 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPM has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 3 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.5 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · PA · Pittsburgh

6,952 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAKER HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOLS 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHI ST VINCENT MORRILTON 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADOBE PALETTES 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adams County Nursery Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handwerk Site Contractors 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1400 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE David M. Maines Associates, Inc. 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Baxter - Marion 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakewood_IFS 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 936 - Fayetteville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 370 - Terre Haute 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fs-Columbia Ma Mlw 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fs-Seton Austin 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE DoubleTree Bakersfield 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwire Company Villa Rica Plant 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.