Continuing Care Retirement Communities · California

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic

San Francisco, CA · ~50 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade A.

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic: 0.3 TCR = 7% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic safety composite

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic held a steady TCR band

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/216
  • PHOTO Brookdale Cumberland
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Cumberland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic averages 0.3 TCR (7% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 216 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in California.

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic
Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic (50 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Chinatown North Beach MH Clinic has fewer employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Francisco

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cumberland 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care Management 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Headquarters Support Center West 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Senior Services 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Coastal Structures Main Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Jets International 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR World Data Products 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kollmorgen KTCS (LC) KL9000 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monmouth Rubber Corp. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twin City Electric Co., Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 60511 - Capstone Hardins Sysco Memphis 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four Daughters, LLC 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.