Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · New Hampshire

Churchill Medical Systems Inc.

Dover, NH · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Churchill Medical Systems Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. safety composite

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2019→2021

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Churchill Medical Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 4.6 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.6 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Dover, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO G W Surfaces (Palma)
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: G W Surfaces (Palma) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Churchill Medical Systems Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. TCR series: 2019=4.6 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Churchill Medical Systems Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in New Hampshire.

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. (79 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Churchill Medical Systems Inc.
Churchill Medical Systems Inc. (79 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Churchill Medical Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 5.7 4.2 4 0 0
2019 4.6 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NH · Dover

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dover, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR G W Surfaces (Palma) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindar Corporation 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR VALTRA INC. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilbert Plastic Services-HNC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Builders Installed Products #340 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Bond Building Products - Portsmouth 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE CounterGravity Directional Cast Operations (DCO) 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intelligent Manufacturing Solutions, LLC 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth Douglass Hospital 3,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth-Douglass Hospital 3,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR WDH/CENTRAL AVENUE 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measured Progress 440 FTE
NAT-TCR 44171l - Shreveport Dc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 44621b - Chesapeake Dc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Univ at Albany Indian Quad 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Brands 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 42151e - Waterbury Dc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 42151a - Milford Dc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49231a - Bakersfield Dc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49231f - Visalia Dc 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.