Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Florida

CIRCOR Industrial Valves

Tampa, FL · ~145 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CIRCOR Industrial Valves runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CIRCOR Industrial Valves: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CIRCOR Industrial Valves safety composite

CIRCOR Industrial Valves scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2019→2022

CIRCOR Industrial Valves injury rate improved

CIRCOR Industrial Valves's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.4 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Emerson Automation S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emerson Automation Solutions US LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

CIRCOR Industrial Valves in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CIRCOR Industrial Valves averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CIRCOR Industrial Valves TCR series: 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CIRCOR Industrial Valves falls in its industry

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t employers in Florida.

CIRCOR Industrial Valves (145 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CIRCOR Industrial Valves
CIRCOR Industrial Valves (145 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

CIRCOR Industrial Valves has more employees than the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regul median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2020 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2019 1.4 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · FL · Tampa

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions US LP 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valmet Flow Control USA Inc dba StoneL 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MVM 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCS Odessa 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PMR Plant Martin 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viera Builders Inc. 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paul Davis Restoration, Inc. 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.W. Roberts Contracting Panama City Division 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookshires #009 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA Alexandria 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HG152 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OSHA Log LPC T 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Ellington 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Welk Resorts Corporate Office 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Ea-Lit-Little Rock-Lit-Trml 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Quality : Sea Bird Electronics - Bellevue 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.