Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP

Mansfield, MA · ~127 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP safety composite

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2024

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP injury rate improved

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Mansfield, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Valmet Flow Control …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valmet Flow Control USA Inc dba StoneL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerson Automation Solutions US LP averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Emerson Automation Solutions US LP falls in its industry

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Angle valves, industrial-type, employers in Massachusetts.

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP (127 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerson Automation Solutions US LP
Emerson Automation Solutions US LP (127 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Emerson Automation Solutions US LP has more employees than the Angle valves, industrial-type, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · MA · Mansfield

298 Angle valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 68 employers in Mansfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valmet Flow Control USA Inc dba StoneL 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CIRCOR Industrial Valves 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MVM 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GCS Odessa 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WHITE S PATH-MA55 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIREKING BAKING CO. 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curia Massachusetts, Inc 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIBA Technologies, Inc. 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mansfield Sales/Admin. 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 360 Forbes Blvd. 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 50 Suffolk Rd. 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 11 Norfolk Rd. 689 FTE
NAT-TCR B and R Electrical 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin State Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DJ's Electrical, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fishburne Educational Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cives Steel Company 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lakone Company 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Ltd. - Cleveland 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE NKC of America, Inc. 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.