Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) · District of Columbia

Circuit Transit Inc- DC

Washington Dc, DC · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Circuit Transit Inc- DC runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) workplace, earning a grade D.

Circuit Transit Inc- DC: 7.0 TCR = 156% of Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Circuit Transit Inc- DC safety composite

Circuit Transit Inc- DC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.1

2023→2024

Circuit Transit Inc- DC injury rate improved

Circuit Transit Inc- DC's TCR fell 14.1 from 14.1 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=14.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Washington Dc, DC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO TriMet Portland Stre…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TriMet Portland Streetcar (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Circuit Transit Inc- DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Circuit Transit Inc- DC averages 7.0 TCR (156% of the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Circuit Transit Inc- DC TCR series: 2023=14.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Circuit Transit Inc- DC falls in its industry

421 Commuter transit systems, mixe establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Commuter transit systems, mixe employers in District of Columbia.

Circuit Transit Inc- DC (20 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Circuit Transit Inc- DC
Circuit Transit Inc- DC (20 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Circuit Transit Inc- DC has fewer employees than the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e. median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.1 14.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · DC · Washington Dc

421 Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 15 employers in Washington Dc, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TriMet Portland Streetcar 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-1132 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-1152 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2234 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE AVA Norma 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Related Management Company LP One Hill South 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Washington 50 Massachusetts Ave 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Textron Corporate - Washington Office 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Control Risks Group LLC 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR 47381 CONRAD WASHINGTON DC 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Washington DC 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4263-47381 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwestern Wire Tulsa 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Northern Virginia 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Biddeford 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Franklin 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sonesta Simply Suites Salt Lake City Airport 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta Select Phoenix Chandler 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jenison 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Valley Medical Center LLC - EVS 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.