Water treatment and distribution · North Carolina

City of Asheville Water Department

Asheville, NC · ~166 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Asheville Water Department runs at 1034% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Asheville Water Department: 12.4 TCR = 1034% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Asheville Water Department safety composite

City of Asheville Water Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Asheville Water Department: 8.3 → 20.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

City of Asheville Water Department's TCR rose 11.9 from 8.3 in 2021 to 20.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 1034% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #32/33
  • PHOTO PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Asheville Water Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Asheville Water Department averages 12.4 TCR (1034% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Asheville Water Department TCR series: 2021=8.3 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=20.3 · BLS 1.2

Where City of Asheville Water Department falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 33 Water treatment and distributi employers in North Carolina.

City of Asheville Water Department (166 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Asheville Water Department
City of Asheville Water Department (166 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

City of Asheville Water Department has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.3 11.9 23 6 0
2023 13.2 8.8 16 2 0
2022 7.8 5.0 11 0 0
2021 8.3 7.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · NC · Asheville

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Kalamazoo-Public Services- Stockbridge 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Three Valleys Municipal Water District 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works City of Wyoming 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Carolina Operations, LLC 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belews Creek Steam Station 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midrex Technologies 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE ODI NC 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Cinnabar California, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wedemeyer Bakery 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Parkway 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northbrook Inn 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Fremont Fire Department 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Chicago Hotel 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Facility LLC 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charter Next Generation, Inc. 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.