General public administration · Minnesota

City of Crookston

Name: City of Crookston Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Crookston, MN · ~90 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 5.2
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Crookston runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Crookston: 5.2 TCR = 163% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Crookston safety composite

City of Crookston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers
DART rate: F 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2019

City of Crookston injury rate improved

City of Crookston's TCR fell 0.9 from 5.7 in 2018 to 4.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Crookston, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 163% of ind

DART 4.7 DART
RANK #144/275
PHOTO Town of Lyman
BOOK 2y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Lyman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

5.2
Town of Lyman

5.2
St. Joseph Cou

5.2
County of Made

5.2
Jackson County

5.2

What this shows City of Crookston averages 5.2 TCR (163% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

City of Crookston TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.7 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Crookston falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 275 General public administration employers in Minnesota.

City of Crookston (90 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Crookston has fewer employees than the General public administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	4.7	4.7	4	0	0
2018	5.7	4.3	4	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Crookston

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 29 employers in Crookston, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Town of Lyman	LYMAN, SC	5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	St. Joseph County	SOUTH BEND, IN	5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	County of Madera	MADERA, CA	5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Jackson County Government	MURPHYSBORO, IL	5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bushel Boy - Owatonna	OWATONNA	90 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Radiant Change Construction, LLC.	ST PAUL	90 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Weis Builders - Minneapolis	RICHFIELD	90 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kelleher Construction, Inc	BURNSVILLE	90 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Diocese of Crookston	Crookston	561 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Diocese Crookston	Crookston	500 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Polk County-All Locations	Crookston	351 FTE
CITY-NEAR	AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY CROOKSTON	Crookston	318 FTE
NAT-TCR	Ontario, United Refrigeration	Ontario, CA	5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	FMCC	Washington, DC	5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Aptar Torrington	Torrington, CT	5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	IRIS USA, Inc. Surprise, AZ	Surprise, AZ	5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	HPASC01	State College, PA	90 FTE
NAT-SIZE	J.R. Tharpe Trucking Co, Inc.	Drakes Branch, VA	90 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nizhoni Health Systems LLC- Stoughton	Stoughton, MA	90 FTE
NAT-SIZE	San Francisco Corporate	San Francisco, CA	90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.